" Neither I nor anyone else is able to judge who has lost everything " A. Zuñiga.
In many cases we must assume that all have a cultural capital, education level, a height similar to the moral one. Suddenly, we find it hard to understand that in Chile we have people whose parents can not read or write, if they have a father or a mother who can not afford a decent education, they see that el trabajo se gana menos que hurtando en las calles o narcotraficando; que, en definitiva, no han llevado una vida similar a la de uno. Nadie se ha hecho cargo del pueblo chileno, sino que ha estado a la deriva por más de 37 años, bajo las imágenes humillantes que entregan los medios y los fusiles que hoy apuntan a cada cabeza que pretenda moverse en la zona de la catástrofe.
Una de las voces cuerdas al respecto es la de Ariel Zuñiga Nuñez , con su columna "Saqueos, lumpen y subhumanos" : (haga click en leer más)
Tanto Kant como Noam Chomsky, un o from philosophy and the other from the language, they conclude that the values \u200b\u200bare universal and inherent. They deduced from their works, and in doing so are imposed.
For example, the Kantian categorical imperative, typically stoic and western humanist "acts in a way that your behavior can be elevated to a universal standard of behavior" is generally accepted spontaneously by those who have been socialized in this culture. Moreover, consistent with principles and mulsulmanes Confucians, and not collide with the Buddhists.
But that is very different to accept values \u200b\u200bthat it is present in all men.
to Thomas Hobbes considers the validity of this principle. Notes that the Leviathan should try to avoid harm and against other everything a man wants for himself. Although no consequences to the violation of this principle because there is more power than the Leviathan, it states that ignored these precepts seriously damaged the foundation of his power, ie, to prevent the man s ea Wolf man. Leviathan for Hobbes should not be the only wolf alive, or the Lion Fox talking Machiavelli, is the ruler so that others do not kill each other.
When refute Kant, and Chomsky, many contend that we are undermining our only link to the beginning by throwing naked nihilism that leads to social chaos and individual suicide. it is not . What you do not want to consider is that when we accept that there is a universal moral precept, is the categorical imperative or Deuteronomy, remember that the English demanded compliance with the Native-Christian, what we do is disregard any and each one of the reasons the other, laying or installing the "otherness" in them .
moral relativism is not synonymous with epistemic relativism is dec go, there is recognition that there is no truth. It is only the defense of the logical principles of David Hume, namely we understand the reality but it does not compel or our beliefs or our values \u200b\u200b . Morality does not depend on the being of things and as I say in many jobs, it is the duty be, our values, which leads us to seek the truth rather than hide it and deal in and aspire to a well-paid position at this time.
us apply this to reality:
When we say "stealing is bad" and then "bad looting stores, or a disaster warrants it, we assume that the others have specifically the same perspective that we in the abstract, that moral evaluation is also regrettable because the legal codes are not conventional, rebus sic stantibus (as circumstances persevere) but worth even when you have not slept three days have not eaten, you have no home, shower, work, etc..
How ridiculous Ivan Nuñez was heard asking the people in accordance with the recommendations of the authority, people to "stay home" and report "on the TV", the disapproved while stealing televisions and omitted that the area directly affected by the earthquake and power is lost between half and one third of the homes.
This is the disastrous result of that moral universalism we stand as a major advance over other western cultures. Faces Kantian standards, and even Chomsky, serve, rather than to evaluate our values \u200b\u200band behaviors, to judge others, call indecent, immoral, criminal, criminals, lumpen, Flaites, animals, subhuman.
Then the reality is used against you, as a mere actuarial calculation of his faults in order to maximize the punishment against him.
is comparable to the dynamic that has been consolidated with the Human Rights in Chile, a structure that will take years to dismantle: do not talk about these principles and shared values \u200b\u200band purpose but as crimes, that is, nothing more than His face negative. The human rights enshrined equality or not confirm the inviolability of conscience but they are worth while "human rights violations" or "crimes against humanity." Thus the experiences of solidarity and full respect will be muted and take their place "tip peuco" or "Villa Grimaldi."
principles deductible by the imperative categorical in its impunity mix between what things are and what we want these to be, give us strength to judge others, who deny the possibility of universalizing its rules. His vulnerability prevents him from defending his motives or to express their motivations, but it is our moral judgments a priori what the silence beforehand.
Installs as a correlate or shade, the wrong victim the victim well, Spartan expects the state arrives at the door of his ruined home and offered a bowl of soup. Those in despair, in the midst of a desperate situation, they're crimina them, those who skip the row deepens the crisis and found to be guilty of the calamity.
I'm an atheist, and in addition, or by implication, also anti-Kantian or antichomskiano. In general, my values, nevertheless, are consistent with those moral precepts and my behavior. other words, if there is a heaven would be a candidate to dwell on it in perpetuity. But that does not mean that I feel entitled to judge the behavior of others, who have not had my chance and are forced to respond differently transformers rmándose in criminal indefensible. I think someone competent to judge, to call them thus, for respond with that criminalizing use of Kantianism which ends in a subhuman and therefore susceptible to exterminate.
or encourage the theft of plasma televisions and washing machines but I understand, morally or authorize it, I react to those who disallowed. Neither I nor anyone in a position to judge who has lost everything , starting with the patient. Justice is the measuring stick, but not what we mean by it in reality but what we want to be someday. The good is always an aspiration, an ideal.
A judge who, as I do feel authorized because it is above me and my opinion not started, is the power of the state, specifically the Chilean, who apart from his bravado and swagger has not been able to feed and quench the thirst of the victims three days after the earthquake.
The government of Chile is waiting for phone companies to resolve the collapse of our telecommunications, public works concessionaires crisis connectivity, providing supermarkets, service stations avoquen to lack of fuel, and media everything else. is the consistent application of "our model" a redundant confirmation that the only liberal in its purest form there in the world are now occupied by the palace of the coin.
And in this division of the press will collect the evidence to judge the morale of the victims of indolence, incompetence and ambition of their rulers. The Thief plasma tv or washing machine is more important than the lack of attention to victims.
Such discourses thrive in the shelter of a well-intentioned moral theory but in his name have been produced half of the atrocities of the past hundred years.
0 comments:
Post a Comment